Aoostar WTR Pro N100 vs CWWK N305 4-LAN
CWWK N305 4-LAN is the more capable pick; Aoostar WTR Pro N100 is the cheaper one - which wins comes down to the job below.
The verdict
- CPU
- CWWK N305 4-LAN has 2x the CPU throughput (10,800 vs 5,333 PassMark).
- Idle power
- CWWK N305 4-LAN idles lower (9W vs 15W) - cheaper to run 24/7.
- Networking
- CWWK N305 4-LAN has more NICs (4 vs 2) - better for a firewall or VLAN trunk.
Which wins for each job
| Job | Aoostar WTR Pro N100 | CWWK N305 4-LAN |
|---|---|---|
| Plex / Jellyfin | ~5 streams | ~5 streams |
| Frigate NVR | ~4 cameras | ~4 cameras |
| Proxmox / VMs | 5,333 PassMark | 10,800 PassMark win |
| Firewall / router | 2 NICs | 4 NICs win |
| Local AI / LLM | no slot | no slot |
Approximate - capacity estimates from curated specs, the same logic as the recommender. Verify against your exact setup. Prices move; check the retailer.
Full specs
| Spec | Aoostar WTR Pro N100 | CWWK N305 4-LAN |
|---|---|---|
| Price (list) | $279 | $279 |
| CPU | Intel Processor N100 | Intel Core i3-N305 |
| Cores / threads | 4 | 8 |
| PassMark | 5,333 | 10,800 |
| iGPU | Intel UHD | UHD |
| NICs | 2 | 4 |
| NIC model | Intel I226-V | Intel I226-V |
| RAM max (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| M.2 free | 0 | 1 |
| PCIe slot | none | none |
| Idle (W) | 15 | 9 |
| TDP (W) | 6 | 15 |