CWWK N305 4-LAN vs GMKtec K6
GMKtec K6 is the more capable pick; CWWK N305 4-LAN is the cheaper one - which wins comes down to the job below.
The verdict
- CPU
- GMKtec K6 has 2.6x the CPU throughput (28,351 vs 10,800 PassMark).
- Idle power
- CWWK N305 4-LAN idles lower (9W vs 14W) - cheaper to run 24/7.
- Networking
- CWWK N305 4-LAN has more NICs (4 vs 2) - better for a firewall or VLAN trunk.
- RAM ceiling
- GMKtec K6 takes more RAM (64GB vs 32GB).
Which wins for each job
| Job | CWWK N305 4-LAN | GMKtec K6 |
|---|---|---|
| Plex / Jellyfin | ~5 streams | ~5 streams |
| Frigate NVR | ~4 cameras win | add a detector |
| Proxmox / VMs | 10,800 PassMark | 28,351 PassMark win |
| Firewall / router | 4 NICs win | 2 NICs |
| Local AI / LLM | no slot | no slot |
Approximate - capacity estimates from curated specs, the same logic as the recommender. Verify against your exact setup. Prices move; check the retailer.
Full specs
| Spec | CWWK N305 4-LAN | GMKtec K6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (list) | $442 | $469 |
| CPU | Intel Core i3-N305 | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| Cores / threads | 8 | 8 |
| PassMark | 10,800 | 28,351 |
| iGPU | UHD | Radeon 780M (RDNA3) |
| NICs | 4 | 2 |
| NIC model | Intel I226-V | Realtek RTL8125 |
| RAM max (GB) | 32 | 64 |
| M.2 free | 1 | 1 |
| PCIe slot | none | none |
| Idle (W) | 9 | 14 |
| TDP (W) | 15 | 54 |