Beelink SER9 vs Ugreen NASync DXP6800 Pro
Beelink SER9 is both faster and cheaper here - the default pick unless you need something specific from the other.
The verdict
- CPU
- Beelink SER9 has 2.6x the CPU throughput (34,991 vs 13,700 PassMark).
- Plex
- Ugreen NASync DXP6800 Pro transcodes more 4K HDR streams (~8 vs ~5).
- Idle power
- Beelink SER9 idles lower (8W vs 24W) - cheaper to run 24/7.
- Networking
- Ugreen NASync DXP6800 Pro has more NICs (2 vs 1) - better for a firewall or VLAN trunk.
- RAM ceiling
- Ugreen NASync DXP6800 Pro takes more RAM (64GB vs 32GB).
Which wins for each job
| Job | Beelink SER9 | Ugreen NASync DXP6800 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Plex / Jellyfin | ~5 streams | ~8 streams win |
| Frigate NVR | add a detector | ~6 cameras win |
| Proxmox / VMs | 34,991 PassMark win | 13,700 PassMark |
| Firewall / router | 1 NICs | 2 NICs win |
| Local AI / LLM | no slot | no slot |
Approximate - capacity estimates from curated specs, the same logic as the recommender. Verify against your exact setup. Prices move; check the retailer.
Full specs
| Spec | Beelink SER9 | Ugreen NASync DXP6800 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price (list) | $999 | $1,099 |
| CPU | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Intel Core i5-1235U |
| Cores / threads | 12 | 10 |
| PassMark | 34,991 | 13,700 |
| iGPU | Radeon 890M (RDNA3.5) | Iris Xe (80 EU) |
| NICs | 1 | 2 |
| NIC model | Intel I226-V | Marvell AQC113 10GbE |
| RAM max (GB) | 32 | 64 |
| M.2 free | 1 | 2 |
| PCIe slot | none | none |
| Idle (W) | 8 | 24 |
| TDP (W) | 65 | 15 |